Anyway idk why I do this but I ran yabs on my router at 3am
It's a celeron j4125. Running opnsense. I was bored.
# yabs on apu2e4... why
CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 @ 2.00GHz
4 cores, no aes-ni, suffering
fio 1M:
read: IOPS=1.2k, BW=1.2GiB/s (usb3 ssd lol)
write: IOPS=947 , BW=947MiB/s
iperf3: 892 Mbps / 891 Mbps
(it's a router. what did i expect.)
geekbench 6: SC 412, MC 1,247
lower than my phone. 💀Idk why I do this
Member
Hi everyone! Saw mention of Vultr Warsaw so made test order yesterday!
New NVMe tier is live! Sent ticket to confirm, they say "gradual rollout" so maybe not all nodes yet.
# Vultr WAW-03, Ryzen 9 5900X
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (24) @ 3.7 GHz
Disk: Samsung PM9A3 960GB
fio: read 2.8GB/s, write 1.9GB/s
iperf3: 2.3 Gbps / 2.1 Gbps
yabs: 82,341Much better than my old WAW-01 instance! Price same for now but they say may increase.
Cheers!
Peer better.
MTR to Vultr WAW-03:
HOST: localhost Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 10.0.0.1 0.0% 10 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.3
2. core-ams-nl.as12389.net 0.0% 10 4.2 4.5 3.9 6.1 0.6
3. peer1.ams-ix.net 0.0% 10 8.7 9.1 8.1 12.4 1.2
4. pl-waw-bb-a1.Vultr.net 0.0% 10 24.3 25.8 23.9 31.2 2.1
5. waw-03.Vultr.net 0.0% 10 24.8 26.2 24.1 34.7 3.0
AS12389 → AMS-IX → AS209552 (Vultr)
single upstream, no diversity. HostHatch WAW has two upstreams, 18ms more latency, better path diversity. Clinical.
Member
Scrap gods came through last tuesday,,,,, ,,,,, Found two e5-2680 v3 for forty bucks at the flea market,,,,, Seller tought they were paperweights,,,,, Posted yabs before even cleaning the dust,,,,,
# dedi special frankenstein box
CPU: 2x E5-2680 v3, 24c/48t
fio: (R=1.2GB/s, W=890MB/s) raidz1 of four sas ssds from 2016
iperf3: 892 Mbps / 847 Mbps
geekbench: SC 812, MC 18456Not bad for scrap,,,,, ~~dave
Member
- Observed: Vultr NVMe tier shows improved sequential throughput.
- Noted: @AlexWei's upstream asymmetry warrants further investigation per Section 14.3 of most providers' TOS regarding "acceptable network utilization patterns."
- Recommendation: Document baseline before gradual rollout completes.
# InterServer test node, FRA-11, Xeon E-2388G
fio: (R=3.4GB/s, W=2.8GB/s)
iperf3: 9.4 Gbps / 9.4 Gbps
geekbench: SC 1876, MC 11234Symmetrical throughput achieved. R.R.
Yo fam
The server حلو at RackNerd Marseille, incha'allah uptime 99.99% but who knows with these shit routes
# RackNerd MRS-02, Ryzen 5 5600X
fio: (R=2.1GB/s, W=1.9GB/s)
iperf3: 1.8 Gbps / 1.6 Gbps
geekbench: SC 1543, MC 8421Price? 8€/month. Not bad, huh?
Oh my, some of you are running production on flea market finds! I'm not judging, but... did you test your restore?
Before your next benchmark, please check:
# my quiet backup box, Time4VPS HEL-01
fio: (R=412MB/s, W=398MB/s)
iperf3: 456 Mbps / 432 Mbps
geekbench: SC 534, MC 2156Slow and steady. Verified restore last Sunday. You?
Member
Hello my friend. Very nice thread here. I tink I have same problem like @FlowSana with power. My e5-2670 v2 idle 78W. Very bad. I check BIOS my friend. No C-states option. Supermicro board from 2013.
# Izmir home lab, ISP Ankara
CPU: E5-2670 v2
fio: (R=198MB/s, W=156MB/s) old sata ssd my friend!!!
iperf3: 94 Mbps / 89 Mbps
geekbench: SC 612, MC 3890I look for ARM my friend. Cheap ARM. Where!
The asymmetry question—@AlexWei raised something important—though I wonder if we're seeing—no, wait—Vultr's rollout might be—actually the NVMe tier—no, the network stack—see, my own test at—no, this is the wrong provider—Contabo London showed—never mind—here:
# Contabo LHR-09, Xeon D-2141I
fio: (R=890MB/s, W=720MB/s)
iperf3: 1.2 Gbps / 1.1 Gbps
geekbench: SC 892, MC 5432—not that this helps—original point lost—something about bufferbloat—