Member
Fun little project: took my Hostinger NAT and threw
docker run -d --name=wireguard --cap-add=NET_ADMIN -p 51820:51820/udpPort forwarding panel actually works, mapped 51820-51825
It actually works for a $12/yr box
Not production but great for learning
Panel is critical. Please check if UDP range is full or only TCP
Hashcat burned by "both" liar that was TCP only
Server must not lie
Member
Me too.
I am buy OVHcloud "both" last year but only TCP working
I am very very angry
Now I use Hostinger SG, $14 is ok, WireGuard is working
Speed is very good, I test yesterday 300mbps
Just spun up a Hostinger ARM box in Singapore and WOW! Ampere Altra, 2 cores, 4GB RAM for that $14/yr price?? Insane value! My old x86 VPS runs circles around it on power draw but the ARM chip absolutely demolishes it in perf-per-watt. Running Pi-hole + Home Assistant + WireGuard (https://www.wireguard.com) simultaneously, load average 0.15. Specs: Neoverse N1 @ 2.8GHz, NVMe, 1Gbps port. If you're not on ARM yet you're burning money!
Member
1. Your Ampere is very nice, I like ARM very much
2. I have Hostinger too but only x86, no ARM available in Singapore location
3. My brother say KnownHost have ARM now? $4/mo NAT but I dont see it in Amsterdam
4. Maybe I check later, very busy with work today
5. Thank you for sharing your specs, I learn lots very much
Minhdock your brother is right about KnownHost but the ARM stock is always gone in five minutes. I have Hostinger x86 in Prague and it is stable but boring, no surprises. Check KnownHost at 3 AM their restock time.
Armstrongvds's enthusiasm redirected to /dev/null. Specs pipe through my attention span but EOF reached at "insane value." | Hostinger ARM | OVHcloud oversold | KnownHost NAT | all eventually piped to the same void. | my $3.50/mo grandfathered box still accepting packets, therefore not null. | will redirect this thread to background process until someone mentions actual SLA numbers. EOF
Member
@Nadia regarding SLA: under EU Consumer Rights Directive, any uptime claim constitutes a binding commercial guarantee. Article 13 flashbacks from the copyright directive debates taught us that "best effort" hosting falls under digital content provision. GDPR compliance requires these $8/yr providers to maintain processor records—I've inquired with KnownHost and Hostinger about their Article 28 obligations. Earnest recommendation: request your Data Processing Agreement before provisioning. The bureaucratic burden on micro-providers is substantial but consumer protection must prevail.
Brusselsdzire1 coming in with the paperwork again I remember when I tried to get Hostinger to install cpanel for me they said no license at that price ended up on some weird panel called "yoke" or something ran my crochet site off it for like 3 months before I realized I wasnt even using the database $14 a year and they answered tickets in 20 minutes tho cant complain moved to InterServer now for the cpanel solo license
Member
The underlying hypervisor doesn't care if your guest is Windows Server or Ubuntu. I have a Hostinger NAT running Windows Server 2022 Core for a small RDP jump box—uses about 800MB RAM idle, handles two concurrent sessions fine. The NAT port forwarding works with RDP if you pick a high port. Not saying it's ideal for production, but for personal use it's perfectly serviceable. Their Singapore routing to my ISP is quite good.