uma
Member
OP
99.99% or bust
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 324
- From:
- Dublin, IE
I have been running bare metal and VPS setups for six years now. The graphs don't lie — my current fleet of fourteen nodes averages 99.97% uptime, but I am starting to hit walls where "I learned it all from the Arch wiki" is not enough for client confidence or my own hiring prospects.
I am looking at LPIC-1/2 versus RHCSA/RHCE. For those of you who actually hire or get hired in hosting operations specifically — not enterprise IT, not DevOps cloud roles, but actual web hosting, dedi management, colo work — which carries weight? I see Contabo https://contabo.com and OVHcloud job postings mention "Linux cert preferred" without specifying which.
I want something that proves I can handle kernel panics at 3 AM, not something that tests my ability to configure LDAP for a Fortune 500. The graphs don't lie, but hiring managers sometimes do. What is the real signal here?
436 days. reboot is surrender.
lucgone
Member
Le Baguette
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 296
- From:
- Lyon, FR
Franchement I tink for hosting the RHCSA is more "enterprise" no? But the LPIC is more general. In my country the small hostings they ask LPIC only. Since 2 days I search job and I see this.
Bref, for me the cert is good but the experience is better, you know? Mdr
Vive la résistance... électrique
MARIA3
Member
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 126
- From:
- Madrid, ES
If applying to US/EU corporate hosting: RHCSA
In Spain it's different. Small hosting here doesn't ask for anything, but when they do, it's LPIC. RHCSA is only known by big companies with enterprise contracts.
I've got LPIC-1 and work at a small provider in Madrid. They've never asked for more.
siesta first, deploy later
uma
Member
OP
99.99% or bust
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 324
- From:
- Dublin, IE
The cert tests execution not knowledge
This is actually why I am leaning RHCSA now. "I learned it from the Arch wiki" means I know things. It does not mean I can execute under pressure with a ticking clock and a broken GRUB. The performance aspect appeals to me. I want to prove I can fix the 3 AM kernel panic, not just theorise about it.
Has anyone here sat the new RHEL 9 version? I heard they added more container content which feels less relevant to bare metal hosting.
436 days. reboot is surrender.