bellaauc
Member
3-2-1 Believer
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 190
- From:
- Auckland, NZ
Netdata is the path of least resistance, but MarchAsadi has the right warning. I ran it for a year, then hit the wall when a customer asked "show me the trend from last quarter." Nothing to show.
So I migrated to Prometheus anyway — https://prometheus.io. The sunk cost fallacy is real with monitoring.
3-2-1 or you're already dead
lucgone
Member
Le Baguette
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 296
- From:
- Lyon, FR
Franck, I can confirm: the Checkmk agent works fine on bare metal. I've got a Dell R620 in Lyon, no issues. Only thing: you need to open port 6556, local firewall has to allow it.
But for temperatures, Checkmk also uses the agent, not IPMI directly. If you want the actual BMC sensors, you need the separate IPMI plugin.
Vive la résistance... électrique
YuriDavid
Member
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 174
- From:
- Kyiv, Ukraine
---
- Checkmk RAW:
- cost: 0 EUR
- agent: required on each node
- bare metal: supported
- IPMI: plugin available, not default
- config method: web UI (WATO)
- Nagios heritage: yes, hidden
- Netdata:
- cost: 0 EUR
- install: one command
- history: limited without backend config
- backend: SQLite (reports of corruption)
- Prometheus path:
- cost: 0 EUR, time investment high
- history: excellent
- small scale: viable per bellaauc
- @blogfranck:
- decision tree:
- want minimal work now, accept migration later: Netdata
- want one migration forever, accept setup work: Checkmk RAW
- want modern standard, accept learning: Prometheus
---
indentation is not optional