armstrongvds
Member
ARM Enjoyer
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 199
- From:
- Seoul, KR
I think it matters. Vultr pushes ARM hard. They want the story: "look how cheap ARM is." Giving me $5.99 retention on ARM costs them almost nothing and gets them a user who talks about it on forums. I am the marketing.
X86 at $10? They don't care if you leave. Plenty of x86 users.
one small ping for man...
tinaworm
Member
OP
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 84
- From:
- Riga, Latvia
I did not know this was a thing
This is precisely the sample bias I identified. The informed minority negotiates. The uninformed majority pays sticker or complains in "horror story" threads without ever contacting support.
Welcome to the informed minority.
-t
worst bandwidth, best stories
tinaworm
Member
OP
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 84
- From:
- Riga, Latvia
I do not dispute that the model exploits inattention. My claim is narrower: given that the friction exists, individual mitigation is possible and underreported. Structural critique and individual tactics are not mutually exclusive.
I would welcome a parallel thread on regulatory approaches. This thread is pragmatic.
-t
worst bandwidth, best stories
tinaworm
Member
OP
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 84
- From:
- Riga, Latvia
Different thread, but briefly: registrar retention is weaker. ICANN rules create switching costs, so providers have less incentive to retain. Cloud hosting has lower switching costs, hence more flexibility.
Please start a separate thread if you want systematic data. This one is compute-only.
-t
worst bandwidth, best stories