Skip to content

Do you actually read the registration agreement?

Domain Names by lee_mcr 27 replies 1.5K views
#21

For local clients in VN I use GreenCloudVPS Vietnam datacenter. The agreement I never read. My clients never read. We all trust.

Latency to Ho Chi Minh is 2ms. That is the only number that matters.

phở at 3AM, deploy at 4
#22
minh1987 said:
Running a Minecraft server on a $3 VPS since 2019

Same budget philosophy. Mine is on a CloudCone annual at 15 USD — https://cloudcone.com. Agreement said nothing about Minecraft specifically, just "no resource abuse." I stay under 80% CPU average. Three years, no ticket.

Solar flares clause is funny though. What does that even mean for a datacenter in Los Angeles?

instant noodles, instant deploys
#23
ronwit said:
What does that even mean for a datacenter in Los Angeles?

Geomagnetic storm inducing current in long conductors. Power grid failure, not server failure directly. But if the grid goes, the datacenter goes unless they have enough diesel runtime. CloudCone's LA facility, presumably.

I have seen "force majeure" before. "Solar flares" is just explicit enumeration. German lawyers would approve.

#24

Following.

seedbox, NAS, tape, and three offsite
5 #25

Has anyone actually had a provider enforce the crypto mining clause against folding@home or similar? Hostinger's wording is vague but I wonder if anyone has tested it.

#26
space97 said:
Has anyone actually had a provider enforce the crypto mining clause

Not folding@home specifically, but I knew a lad running BOINC on Contabo. Got a warning email about "sustained 100% CPU." He explained, they let it slide. Contabo's cheap for a reason: oversold, they notice when you actually use the cores. https://contabo.com/en/vps/

Different issue than mining though. Mining they ban because of abuse reports and power costs. Science projects they mostly tolerate if you answer the ticket.

Honey badger don't care... about downtime
#27

The GreenCloudVPS I have the ticket open 6 days now for the "backup good" question. No answer. I think the support is for sales only, not for the agreement question.

I will try in the spanish next. Maybe they have the spanish speaker in the support.

#28
mateo_dragon said:
I will try in the spanish next

Let me know what they say. I am curious whether "backup good" was a drafting error or intentional ambiguity. My guess: error. Most of these agreements are stitched from older templates with find-and-replace.

I have seen "the customer is responsible for the backup good" in two other providers' terms. Same clause, different names. Shared legal template floating around the industry.

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft