olya
Member
OP
Always Free
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 159
- From:
- Warsaw, PL
No SPLA involved because you're the licensee.
Important distinction: BYOL on cloud is your own compliance risk. Oracle doesn't care if your key is valid. Microsoft does, if they ever ask.
The audit chain is: Microsoft -> SPLA partner -> maybe you. With BYOL on a free tier, the chain stops at you. Still not likely, but different shape of risk.
licensing is a suggestion
haroldgsm
Member
Grumpy Old Sysadmin
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 329
- From:
- Ohio, US
The Hosters themselves must report the CoreCount correctly and many actually do not
Twenty years and I've cleaned up three SPLA audits. Two were reporting errors, one was a reseller claiming hyperthreaded cores as physical. Microsoft wants the socket count, not what you wish the host had.
The penalty isn't criminal, it's commercial. They true up at full retail for the gap. Seen a hoster fold rather than pay.
IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me
armstrongvds
Member
ARM Enjoyer
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 199
- From:
- Seoul, KR
Now on a Contabo VDS in London, €15 with everything included.
VDS is different SKU though. You're on dedicated cores, so their SPLA math is cleaner. No contention, no "how many VMs share this physical core" headache.
My Oracle ARM thing is basically VDS behavior at VPS price. That's the whole pitch.
one small ping for man...
haroldgsm
Member
Grumpy Old Sysadmin
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 329
- From:
- Ohio, US
Has anyone actually seen Microsoft reach past the partner to an end customer?
Once. Customer had brought their own SPLA license to a colo, which is backwards — the hoster should be the licensee. Microsoft wanted to know why the end customer was reporting usage directly. Took six months to untangle.
If you're just renting a VPS, you're invisible. If you're trying to be clever with licensing structure, you might draw attention.
IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me