Following. Same situation, VirMach not InterServer, same question. Going ext4 based on this thread.
Storage VPS: ZFS or ext4?
This. The thread answered in 4 replies and we kept going for 20 more. Love forums.
Has anyone tested bcachefs on 512MB? I know, I know, "not production ready," but the memory footprint is supposed to be lower than ZFS. Just asking before I spin up a test.
Tried last month on a Hetzner CX11. Would not compile on 1GB without zram, OOM during fsck equivalent. Maybe in 2025. Maybe not. Don't.
What about btrfs? I know, I know, "btrfs is ZFS's little brother who didn't go to college," but send/receive is nice and the memory footprint is... I actually don't know. Anyone measured?
Measured on my 2GB VPS: 60-80MB idle with no compression, 100MB with zstd. Better than ZFS, worse than ext4. The "free space cache v2" eats RAM proportional to filesystem size though, so 500GB might hurt.
Still wouldn't on 512MB. The tooling is also half-baked for automated snapshots.
99.99% or bust and I have 14 status pages. None of them care about the filesystem. They care if the service answers. ext4 answers. ZFS on 512MB does not answer, it swaps, and then my status page is red and I am sad.
Dublin to anywhere is 20ms. The protocol is TCP, the filesystem is irrelevant.
Yaml victim I understood kubernetes once in 2019 and I understood zfs arc parameters once in 2021. Both times I forgot and both times I regretted the yak shave. ext4. no yaml for fstab. Bless.
Late to this but:
It was a Black Friday 2023 flash deal. Gone now. They do storage specials a few times a year, follow LowEndBox/LowEndTalk. The regular $2.50/mo is 1GB RAM + 30GB SSD, different product.
This thread is from January btw, check the dates.