Should deal threads require price-per-year normalization?

playersofia

Member OP

Joined:: Feb 2025
Posts:: 40
From:: Sofia, Bulgaria

2mo ago

2001:0db8:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001 here with a proposal for deal thread normalization. Currently promotional pricing uses arbitrary billing cycles: 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001 month, 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0003 months, 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001 year. This is address space waste for comparison purposes. I propose mandatory price-per-year display using expanded notation. Legacy IP thinking has infected our deal threads with NAT-like obfuscation. Dual-stack display acceptable as compromise. NAT is not acceptable. A /64 of clarity in a /128 of confusion.

RAJ

Member

Joined:: Jul 2024
Posts:: 294
From:: Mumbai, IN

2mo ago

4 #2

playersofia said:

I propose mandatory price-per-year display using expanded notation.

Guys this hits my margins hard actually any leads on panels that auto-calculate this my customers get confused by the promo pricing vs renewal and I get the tickets not the provider

your margin is my opportunity

btrfs

Member

snapshot obsessive

Joined:: Aug 2024
Posts:: 42
From:: Zurich, Switzerland

2mo ago · edited

Expanded notation would make threads unreadable

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft