Skip to content

Monitoring disk health on KVM VPS without SMART access

VPS Hosting by frankfurt_ops 16 replies 2.3K views
#11
minh1987 said:
No separate checksum tier

Of course not. They sell you the illusion of a disk, not a disk. I pay Leaseweb 89 EUR for a Frankfurt bare metal where I can actually run smartctl. Worth every cent for the sanity alone.

not your keys, not your coins
#12

I run 7 VPS across 5 providers and I just use restic to Backblaze B2. Built-in integrity checks, deduplication, and I pay maybe 4 USD a month for the storage. No manual checksum scripts. The snapshot verify catches bit rot on restore if it ever happens.

#13

Backblaze B2 egress to Istanbul is expensive. I use Wasabi, flat rate, no egress fees. Same restic workflow. The verification is the same, the bill is smaller for my use case.

#14
MeritBudi said:
restic to Backblaze B2

Restic is fine until you need to verify a 4TB archive and your VPS has a 100Mbit pipe. My bare metal can push 1Gbit sustained, so the math works. On a 3 EUR VPS you're waiting a day for verify to finish. Checksums are ugly but they're local and they're fast.

IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me
#15
haroldgsm said:
Waiting a day for verify to finish

Confirmed. I tried restic on a Time4VPS storage instance, 2 vCPU. Verify of 600GB took 14 hours. Back to md5sum. Sometimes the ugly solution is the right solution.

#16

Following this thread. I have a client asking for backup strategy and I need numbers like that 14 hours to set expectations.

phở at 3AM, deploy at 4
2 #17

Did anyone test rclone crypt + check on these providers? I use it for Google Drive but never for VPS-to-VPS.

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft