Skip to content
Register

What spam filter actually catches things without false positives?

Web Hosting by tallinnying 1 replies 148 views
tallinnying

Member OP

Night Shift

#1

So I did a thing. Client getting 200 spam/day through spamassassin, sa-learn trained, bayes at 0.95, still garbage. Anyway, idk why I do this but I set up rspamd on a 3am whim and false positives dropped like 80%? Idk why I do this.

Made a quick poll since I'm curious what everyone else runs. Options:

  • SpamAssassin (default pain)
  • Rspamd (my new friend)
  • MailScanner (old school?)
  • Proxmox Mail Gateway (someone mentioned)
  • Cloud filter (Leaseweb has one?)
  • Just suffer (valid)

Also accidentally blacklisted myself testing yesterday.

builds at 3AM, sleeps at noon
garykwh

Member

Inference on a Budget

4 #2

Lol ngl I just use whatever the panel gives me. Running some LLM inference on the side so my mailserver gets like 5% attention. Rspamd sounds nice tho, less ram than SA? My vram math says every mb counts when you're squeezing 7B models into 8gb

Voted rspamd, trusting the 3am wisdom

CUDA cores are my love language

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft