lee_mcr
Member
OP
- Joined:
- Sep 2024
- Posts:
- 242
- From:
- Manchester, UK
Right then, bit of a paranoid one this. I'm with Hostinger (shameless ) and we've had customers lose data to "cloud" providers that turned out to be one guy with a Synology in a cupboard. So I get the skepticism.
My current setup:
- Primary: rsnapshot to a KnownHost box I actually trust
- Secondary: encrypted tarballs to my sister in New Zealand, rotated on USB drives
- Tertiary: a mate's basement server in Amsterdam, friend-of-friend arrangement
The USB rotation is proper elaborate. I post her a drive, she posts the old one back. Takes 3 weeks. The 3-2-1 rule with extra steps and international postage.
But I'm curious — what do you lot do when "just use S3" feels wrong? Peer-to-peer? Small providers you actually know? Something weirder?
Honey badger don't care... about downtime
uma
Member
99.99% or bust
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 324
- From:
- Dublin, IE
My backup target has 99.997% uptime over 4 years. That's CloudCone in Los Angeles, single admin, publishes actual status page with real incidents. I rsync nightly, ZFS send weekly, test restore monthly. But the status page might. I monitor his status page FROM my monitoring. If my monitor can't reach his status page, I alert. If his status page says up but my monitor says down, I know which to trust. For second site I use a GreenCloudVPS VM in Singapore. The latency is terrible for restore but the geographic separation is the point. No friends. No USB. No trust. Just redundancy and verification.
436 days. reboot is surrender.