SingaporeRep
Member
OP
Benchmark Addict
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 227
- From:
- Singapore, SG
So I ran a quick network check on my Contabo VPS and got this:
traceroute to 203.0.113.45 (203.0.113.45), 30 hops max
1 10.64.0.1 (10.64.0.1) 0.412 ms
2 10.64.0.1 (10.64.0.1) 0.389 ms
3 172.16.83.1 (172.16.83.1) 1.102 ms
4 203.0.113.45 (203.0.113.45) 1.205 ms
Hop 1 and 2 same IP, then private 172.16.x.x before landing on my own public. Latency looks synthetic, not real path. CGNAT artifact or what? Network meh, disk IO decent at 850MB/s.
fio, iperf, geekbench. results or gtfo.
Doug
Member
New Jersey
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 271
- From:
- New Jersey, US
grabs popcorn, checks /r/drama
Zurich1984
Member
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 118
- From:
- Zurich, CH
/24 will cost you a kidney by 2027, mark my words.
/24 for sale. No lowballs.
haroldgsm
Member
Grumpy Old Sysadmin
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 329
- From:
- Ohio, US
This is a known implementation from certain CGNAT vendors, the loopback reflection with synthetic hop injection. Mark my words, you will see more of this as IPv4 scarcity deepens. The vendor will deny it until someone files a proper bug.
IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me
