Skip to content

NVMe is overrated for most VPS workloads

VPS Hosting by larryjeong 6 replies 357 views
8 #1

Youre paying $4 extra for nvme when sata ssd gets you 97% there for most stuff

Ran sysbench on my $4/mo Hostinger sata box vs my $16/mo KnownHost nvme box. 4k rand read: 2800 vs 3100 iops. Big whoop. Sequential? Basically identical.

For web hosting, light db, git, whatever? The nvme tax is a ripoff imo. Save the $4 and get another vps.

A lot of benchmarks in this space are synthetic garbage that dont match real workloads anyway

$3/year. 128MB RAM. Pure happiness.
3 #2

Youre both missing the real game which is the $3/yrs from RackNerd that dont exist anymore because they were sata and sata is dead to the market now,,,,, nvme is just the excuse to kill the cheap plans,,,,, I had a GreenCloudVPS sata box from 2019 that outlived three nvme nodes from "better" providers,,,,, The scrap gods remember,,,,, The scrap gods dont need your iops,,,,,

~~dave

#3

Wey larry thats wild bro but actually I tested this too on my CloudCone box and the nvme was faster for docker builds bro!! Like 40% faster wey!!

But then I realized I dont actually build docker images on my vps lol I build local and push so ?? Why do I even care bro

Still tho for compile workloads it matters wey!!

declarative or death
2 #4
larryjeong said:
$4 extra for nvme

$4/yr is 33% price hike. For 3% performance. Thats not a deal, thats not a steal, thats robbery.

Found a Time4VPS sata plan, 2GB RAM 50GB storage, €10/yr. Their nvme equivalent? $15/yr for 30GB. Less space, more money. Price-per-GB destroyed.

Free trials on nvme plans are bait. They know you wont benchmark properly.

#5

2800 vs 3100 is inside run-to-run variance. Did you test 10 times?

#6

Which Hostinger plan, the 512mb or 1gb

#7

Docker builds are the only place ive seen it matter tbh

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft