Skip to content

Network consistency beats peak speed

VPS Hosting by wilmaethqn44 8 replies 1.1K views
8 #1

Hi all, sorry for the silly question maybe but I ran iperf3 for a week against my Contabo VPS and made some graphs. Everyone talks about Gbps this and Gbps that but honestly? My jitter was all over the place during peak hours and my little game server felt laggy even when speedtest said 900+ Mbps.

The consistent runs (low stddev) felt SO much better for my players. Is this a known thing or am I doing something wrong?

I can share the CSV if anyone wants, its not pretty though.

frames, tables, still valid HTML
#2

Anyway I grabbed your csv and threw it at gnuplot at 3am idk why I do this

Jitter vs fps drop correlation r=0.83 on my end. Used my InterServer box same region.

bash
For h in {1..168}; do iperf3 -c $host -J --get-server-output; sleep 3600; done

The 3am runs were best obviously. Network stack half asleep same as me

builds at 3AM, sleeps at noon
#3

Network okay.

Jitter killed my rust server. Perkele. Moved to KnownHost. Stddev under 2ms now.

Peak speed 400 better than 900 wobbly.

#4

Caramba! Nossa, I never thought about this way, no? I have this Hostinger box for my little minecraft for the cousins, and they always complain "tio beto is lagging" but speedtest say is fast! Now I see, the jitter, not the speed, ne?

I dont have no fancy graphs but I feel this in my bones now. Gonna check my logs, see if I find something. Thank you wilmaethqn44!

#5

NOTE: validating OP findings
---
- Contabo: 847 Mbps avg, 34ms jitter worst case
- InterServer: 612 Mbps avg, 8ms jitter worst case
- winner: InterServer for real-time workloads
---
WARNING: peak speed is vanity metric for UDP-based services
---
- collected 3 weeks data from 6 providers
- published: https://github.com
- methodology: hourly iperf3, parsed with python, graphed with grafana

Anyone can submit results. PRs welcome.

indentation is not optional
#6

Wow

Nice

Lol

#7

Jitter matters more than peak, I learned that the hard way

#8

Which kernel was Contabo running

#9

R=0.83 with one week of data? That's thin.

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft