IPv4 scarcity is a manufactured crisis. Think about it. NAT exists. IPv6 exists. You can put thousands of hosts behind one public IP and nobody cares. The whole "oh no we are running out" thing is just so ARIN and RIPE can keep auction prices stupid high for their buddies. My home lab runs 40+ services on a single IP with reverse proxy. Never had problem. The only people crying about IPv4 are speculators and old network admins who refuse to learn v6. It is a racket. You know it. I know it.
IPv4 scarcity is a manufactured crisis
I watch auction sites for decommissioned storage servers and the IPv4 block often costs more than the hardware.
Your home lab comparison falls apart at scale:
- CGNAT breaks P2P applications
- Enterprise needs audit trails per host
- SSL certificates on shared IPs still have edge cases
- ZFS send over NAT? Painful
That said, the market manipulation point is real. RIPE runout created artificial scarcity tiers.
zfs send | zfs receive. repeat.
CGNAT breaking P2P is the real issue nobody wants to fix.