uma
Member
99.99% or bust
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 324
- From:
- Dublin, IE
I've had I2P running on a OVHcloud box since March, 99.97% uptime on the router itself. The host node is another story; their status page might as well be a static PNG for all the accuracy it provides.
Alert fatigue is real. I stopped paging myself for "participating tunnel count < 3" after two weeks.
436 days. reboot is surrender.
GeorgeNmp
Member
AS64512
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 218
- From:
- Ashburn, US
The I2P transport layer is genuinely interesting from a networking perspective. NTCP2 over TCP/443 for obfuscation, SSU2 for UDP—both with noise protocols for handshake obfuscation. The floodfill routers function similarly to DHT bootstrap nodes, but with garlic routing for store-and-forward.
What's less discussed: the bandwidth commitment. A participating router wants 128KB/s minimum for decent integration. At Vultr's transit pricing for that commit, you're looking at meaningful cost for a "free" anonymity network.
iBGP, eBGP, don't care, just peer
pauloserver
Member
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 117
- From:
- São Paulo, Brazil
This is crazy I check my OVHcloud panel and it is same physical node too!!! That Fremont cage with serial number ending in 7B2???
Prague1983 my friend we are all neighbors and not even know it!!! I2P-ception!!! Going to share bandwidth with strangers on same host run anonymity network hide from same host admin
This is why self-host never trust cloud
chill infrastructure for chill people 🦫