tomchan
Member
OP
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 202
- From:
- Bristol, UK
Fun little project gone weird here. Was mapping some ipv4 space for a "what's still running telnet" thing on a cheap NAT VPS from OVHcloud. Spun up a /24 scan with masscan, rate limited, thought I was being polite.
Two weeks later my IP is on every blacklist under the sun. Spamhaus, abuseat, the works. Can't even git push without captcha hell.
But here's the twist: I kept the logs. Started correlating. Now I sell aggregated "scan noise" feeds to one of those same blacklists through a side llc. It actually works.
My question is: how doomed am I legally? This feels like a "create problem, sell solution" meme but with BGP-adjacent IP reputation data
masscan 0.0.0.0/0 -p23 --rate 1000 -oJ out.json
works on my bench ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
SamAlvi
Member
Self-Host Everything
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 188
- From:
- Portland, US
Commercial threat intel feeds are a racket when you can self-host your own reconnaissance pipeline and then monetize the telemetry. This is the way.
Seriously though, the docker compose stack for this writes itself. Masscan → redis queue → postgres with postgis for geolocation → nginx reverse proxy with rate limiting on the API. I have something similar for my honeypot logs, though I give that data away free to the community.
The legal exposure depends on your ToS with OVHcloud and whether your "side llc" discloses the source. Most VPS terms prohibit "network scanning" broadly — check your provider's terms at https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/vps/. The NAT layer helps but isn't a liability shield.
my cloud. my rules. my 3AM alerts.