debDebi
Member
- Joined:
- Jan 2025
- Posts:
- 28
- From:
- Gdansk, Poland
The European Union Is Always Making New Rules. I Am Thinking The Small Hosts Will Suffer The Most Because The Compliance Costs Are Not Small. I Know A Guy Who Runs The Vhisper Host And He Is Already Looking At The Contabo Because The Dc In The Nuremberg Is Too Expensive Now. It Is Not Fair For The Little Guys. The Big Clouds Will Just Pass The Costs To Us Anyvay.
apt-get install everything
mediaaustin
Member
Deliverability Nerd
- Joined:
- Jul 2024
- Posts:
- 276
- From:
- Austin, US
Everyone in this thread is overthinking the infrastructure side and underthinking the email side. For what it's worth, these new reporting requirements mean your DC will be sending a lot more notification emails to you about compliance status, energy reports, audit schedules. If your SPF is softfail and you are relying on your provider's outbound relay, you are going to see delivery issues when these automated systems start scaling up their volume. I have already seen two blocklists add "greenwashing" as a category and some of the compliance reporting domains are landing on passive DNS reputation lists because they look like bulk senders. Check your DMARC reports, people.
SPF, DKIM, DMARC — holy trinity ✉️
rustyrack_grag
Member
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 68
- From:
- Tallinn, Estonia
- the regulations apply to existing facilities, not just new builds
- the 500kW threshold is measured at IT equipment load, not facility peak
- heat reuse plans require contractual agreements with off-takers, not just technical feasibility
- reporting begins Q1 2027 with annual cadence
I am not concerned. Our facility at Hetzner already operates below 1.15 PUE because the owner refuses to spend money on comfort cooling for the meet-me room. This is documented in section 14.3 of the colocation TOS regarding "environmental conditions in non-leased spaces." the efficiency is a side effect of cheapness, not design. RR
if it ain't broke, rust it