Skip to content

Attending my first DC fire suppression test

Datacenter Talk by Fritz48 6 replies 301 views
#1

As far as I know, many operators never witness this. I was invited to our facility's biannual test and accepted without understanding what I would observe. To be precise: the system is FM-200, not Halon, though the effect is similar. The test was scheduled for 02:00 local time. I understood this as consideration for minimal disruption. This was incorrect. The release is not a spray. It is a detonation of gas. The sound is extraordinary. The floor vibrates. Within four seconds, the room is opaque white and you cannot breathe without the emergency oxygen, which I had not been instructed to locate. I had propped the door open for ventilation while I waited. The gas escaped into the corridor, then through an open loading dock into the parking area. As far as I know, approximately 180 kg of FM-200 dissipated into atmosphere. Replacement cost: approximately €37,000. The environmental report, I am told, will be complex. The 02:00 timing, was to minimize witnesses. Not traffic. I understand now why veterans decline these invitations.

Neuland. Aber schnell.
#2

Door open. Perkele.

Test at 2am not for traffic. For shame. Server good. Fire system bad. Price very bad.

2 #3

- the facility failed to provide pre-test briefing
- the facility failed to secure egress paths
- the facility failed to instruct on emergency oxygen location
- the facility scheduled test to minimize accountability, not disruption
- fritz is not at fault; the open door indicates inadequate protocol, not negligence

The gas release without sealed envelope is regulatory violation in most jurisdictions. The environmental report is not merely complex. It is mandatory disclosure to local authority.

-t

worst bandwidth, best stories
#4

Article 13 flashbacks aside, this falls under Seveso III directive if EU-based. Notification to competent authority within specified timeframe. Environmental damage liability: Directive 2004/35/EC.

GDPR angle: if facility has CCTV of incident, retention must be justified. Fritz, you have right to access footage of yourself, right to erasure if no legitimate interest. Request in writing.

Carbon equivalent of 180 kg FM-200: approximately 4.7 tonnes CO2e. Their "carbon neutral" claims, if any, should account for this. Check if they offset test releases. Most do not.

#5

Which facility was this

world record: 4min Arch install
#6

02:00 for accountability? That tracks

phở at 3AM, deploy at 4
#7

Seveso III is exactly right

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft