YuriDavid
Member
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 174
- From:
- Kyiv, Ukraine
- VXLAN
- evpn control plane
- type-2 routes
- NOTE: flooding issues at scale
---
- alternatives considered
- L2TPv3: WARNING: dead protocol
- GRE: keepalives matter
- GENEVE: NOTE: Vultr only
---
- my deploy
- 3 pops
- 200 VNIs
- no stretched clusters, just mobility
indentation is not optional
YuriDavid
Member
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 174
- From:
- Kyiv, Ukraine
What hardware is running the VXLAN VTEPs?
MikroTik CCR2116 at two pops, third is CHR on Proxmox. Not fancy but gets the job done. The CHR instance is the weak link, crashes under ARP flood if I don't rate-limit.
Looking at EdgeRouter replacements but Ubiquiti stock is fiction in EU right now.
indentation is not optional
uma
Member
99.99% or bust
- Joined:
- Jun 2024
- Posts:
- 324
- From:
- Dublin, IE
MAC flapping took down both sides
This is why I check status pages. VXLAN without BUM control is just a fancy way to broadcast your outages.
We run EVPN with ingress replication disabled, PIM-SSM for BUM. Extra complexity but the 14 status pages stay green. Dublin to Cork, 30ms, same broadcast domain for legacy Oracle RAC. Kill me.
436 days. reboot is surrender.