Skip to content

Six months with DirectAdmin

Web Hosting by svendeal 6 replies 356 views
#1

Been on cPanel since forever but those price hikes man, SNAPPED IT UP when I found DirectAdmin for $12/YR ARE YOU KIDDING. Six months in now so figured I'd post a real review.

The learning curve is REAL. First week I was clicking everywhere trying to find basic stuff. Backup wizard? Different place. SSL? Different flow. Felt like moving houses and not knowing where the light switches are.

But month two something clicked. It's faster. Cleaner. No bloat. My cheap Contabo shared plan feels snappier than my old cPanel setup on better hardware. Resource usage dropped maybe 30%.

Downsides: skin ecosystem is weak. Some plugins I miss. Support docs are thin compared to cPanel's ocean.

Overall? For personal projects and small clients I'm converted. The $12/yr deal I got was a promo but even at regular price it's solid. Would not recommend for resellers yet, the multi-account tools aren't th

world record: 4min Arch install
#2
svendeal said:
Resource usage dropped maybe 30%.

Appreciate the field report; redundant feeds matter less than UX flow in this segment.

We evaluated DirectAdmin for an enterprise-grade migration last quarter. N+1 power on the management nodes was our primary concern; the panel itself is lightweight but the surrounding orchestration required significant engineering. Our sales team can discuss pricing if your volume justifies redundant uplinks.

For single-tenant shared hosting the virtualization tax is minimal. Your 30% resource improvement aligns with our internal benchmarks on identical hardware generations. The skin ecosystem remains a gap; we maintain a custom fork for client consistency.

1 #3
svendeal said:
Resource usage dropped maybe 30%.

The virtualization tax here is actually in your favor. CPanel's overhead isn't strictly virtualization-related but the principle applies: every abstraction layer consumes resources. DirectAdmin runs closer to bare metal in terms of process count.

Your 30% improvement likely reflects reduced PHP-FPM bloat and cleaner cgroup accounting. CPanel's implementation of LVE limits carries significant kernel overhead in userland tracking. DirectAdmin delegates more to the OS scheduler.

OpenVZ containers would erase most of this gain. If Contabo ever migrates you to OpenVZ, demand KVM or leave. The kernel version flexibility alone justifies the virtualization tax for KVM.

virsh list --all | wc -l: 47
#4

Actually I used DirectAdmin two year already and not my circus, not my monkeys about cPanel drama anymore. The price is not bad not good, you know? I don't have no problems with backup, maybe because I don't use no wizard, just rsync. XD

The CEO he is active on forum sometimes, not like big corporate ghost. Actually this is good I think, you can shout at someone real. My english is not perfect but you understand yes?

#5

The vendor engagement dynamic interests me. DirectAdmin's CEO replied to my migration thread in 2019 with a feature roadmap that materialized within eighteen months. This level of access cuts both ways. Accountability rises but so does expectation inflation. I declined a beta testing invitation to preserve editorial independence. The community benefits from proximity yet risks capture; -- Marcus

#6

Which Contabo plan is this, the starter or the pro

#7

30% improvement on SHARED? Cmon

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft