Skip to content

My spreadsheet for comparing host specs

General Discussion by kat_fold 11 replies 4.2K views
#1

Hey folks, been tracking host specs in a spreadsheet for two years now and figured id share my template. Columns are price, ram, cpu cores, storage type, bandwidth, location, ipv4 cost, and a calculated value score. Heres a screenshot of my top ten from last month. Feel free to copy the structure or paste your own rows and ill merge them in 👍

~be kind or be gone~
4 #2

Where is the popcorn column?

#3

Oh man I have something like this but its just a txt file with tabs and I never thought to do a value score thats genius actually ive been manually sorting by price per gb ram and its such a pain can you add a column for yearly renewal vs first term price cause thats where they get you

4 #4

  • Suggest adding CPU passmark single-thread score for meaningful comparison.
  • Include virtualization type (KVM vs LXC) as it affects kernel module availability.
  • Track BGP session limits if you plan anycast.
  • My current dataset covers 47 providers across 12 PoPs.

Practical recommendation: publish this as a read-only page and accept PRs via Git to maintain version history.

It's always DNS. Always.
#5

The cheapest I found was $8/yr for 512mb but ipv4 was $2 extra so I passed. Definitely need that renewal column. My sheet is just provider names and prices in notepad lol. Anyone got a $10/yr deal with actual cpu and not openvz

4 #6

This is very good idea we make a test in my country with OVHcloud and Vultr both is very fast 😂 I will add my data tonight with brazil ping times someone should do south america column because alot of sheets forget us

6 #7
kat_fold said:
Price, ram, cpu cores, storage type, bandwidth, location, ipv4 cost, and a calculated value score

SNAPPED UP a Contabo €4/MO ARE YOU KIDDING last black friday. Was €6 before. Tracking shows Hetzner dropped from €15 to €9 for 1gb then killed the plan. My price history sheet goes back to 2021. Will dump it here

world record: 4min Arch install
#8

Does your value score weight CPU and RAM equally, or is one favoured?

IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me
#9

40 days but this is still useful.

haroldgsm said:
Does your value score weight CPU and RAM equally, or is one favoured?

I always wondered the same thing. On my end I ended up splitting it into two scores, one for CPU-heavy workloads and one for RAM-heavy, since a lot of providers skew cheap on one and expensive on the other. Makes it harder to compare but at least you know what you're actually paying for.

Did you ever add that renewal price column, kat_fold? That's the real killer for long term tracking

ping so high I wave back
#10

Hey, this thread went quiet but I was just digging through old bookmarks and found it again

haroldgsm said:
Does your value score weight CPU and RAM equally, or is one favoured?

I ended up building something similar for my team and we weight RAM about 1.5x CPU for our use case, mostly because our workloads are memory-bound. Would be curious what kat_fold settled on if they ever updated this

Also Nadia59's point about renewal pricing is the real killer, we got stung by Contabo last year on that exact thing. First term looked amazing, year two was basically double.

Did anyone ever fork this into a shared doc or did it stay screenshot-only

It's always DNS. Always.

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft