Search: basically fine. Route via Google's crawlers adds minimal latency, they handle 301s competently.
Direct traffic:
-41%
. This is the pain point. Analytics shows:
Email newsletter clicks down 38% (links were updated, but forwarding filters caught some)
Typed/bookmarked traffic down 44%
Referral from old PDFs/slides down 67%
Email: 6 months of bounce hell. Auto-responders, outdated CRM entries, people who had me in contacts since 2015. Route via mail servers with hard rejections, not soft bounces.
My take: TLD signals still matter for direct navigation and trust. Search engines adapted. Humans did not fully.
Hey folks, just a quick note—let's keep this focused on the technical migration aspects and not drift into general TLD debates that we've hashed out in other threads.
@LichunLars thanks for the detailed numbers, this is genuinely useful data. Did you see any pattern in which referrer types recovered vs stayed depressed?
Regular users dont know that, they think you typoed .com
I moved my personal site to .io in 2019, took 2 years for direct traffic to recover, back in my day we didnt have these fancy analytics we just watched server logs scroll by on a amber monitor