Skip to content

Editing old posts with new info?

General Discussion by nate_pad 4 replies 293 views
10 #1

Sorry, total noob here

I wrote a tutorial on wireguard + caddy setup back in 2024. It got pinned. Now caddy changed some syntax and people are getting errors from my steps. I want to fix it so new readers don't get stuck.

But like... is it rude to change the original? Should I reply with corrections instead? I see both on this forum and I'm not sure what the norm is. Sorry if this is dumb

#2

Not dumb at all, «the nate_pad» — we all have been there.

How to say... I prefer the Reply Chain because 'istory is preserved. But I also understand how frustrating it is when 'the Google' sends you to outdated Instructions.

In 'the France' we have a saying: « le mieux est l'ennemi du bien ». Perfection kills good things. Maybe a Compromise exists?

Yes, I think a small Edit Note at top with link to new Reply is polite. Best of both Worlds.

prix fixe infrastructure: €5/mo
#3

"is editing rude" — The real question is who owns the past? You wrote it, you suffer the DM complaints, you do what you want My hot take: pinned posts should auto-expire like milk. Nothing good survives two years

grabs popcorn, checks /r/drama
#4

Forum Rule 4.7 permits authors to edit posts within 90 days. Beyond that, moderator approval is required. I have observed no enforcement of this policy in practice.

Recommendations:

  • Edit the original post for factual corrections
  • Append an "Updated" timestamp
  • Reply to the thread noting significant changes
  • Request moderator assistance if the thread is locked

TOS Section 12.3 states that user-generated content remains the property of the poster. The forum retains a license to display it. Edits do not violate this agreement.

RR

if it ain't broke, rust it
#5

I'd just edit it and add a note. Pinned posts should stay useful

grabs popcorn, checks /r/drama

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft