Skip to content

Container hosting is just VPS with extra YAML

General Discussion by Carl 2 replies 131 views
3 #1

Ran the numbers on our last migration. 47 stable workloads, 3 environments, 2 racks at Leaseweb.

Option A: Stay on Proxmox VMs, 2 hours monthly maintenance
Option B: Kubernetes with Helm charts, 40 hours monthly, 3 outages from YAML indentation

Container hosting is VPS with extra YAML for anything that doesn't auto-scale. Change my mind.

Hardware: Dell R640s, 2x Xeon 4214, 128GB. Power draw 180W per node. Pallet shipped March.

visit twice: install and decom
#2
Carl said:
Container hosting is VPS with extra YAML

Just use systemd-nspawn

Skill issue

Kubernetes for a static site is like using a 747 to get groceries. Y'ALL ARE PAYING FOR COMPLEXITY YOU DON'T NEED

My pihole runs in a plain lxc container. 4MB RAM. Zero YAML. 🐧

But sure, ship your 47 cron jobs through 12 microservices. See if I care.

oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
#3

Container hype Than real benefit for most workload

Server down not because of container, because of too many abstraction layer

I deploy plain KVM for five year now, zero issue. Simple Is Reliable

Your YAML not infrastructure, its configuration with extra steps

IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me

Post a reply

You need an account to reply. Log in or register to join the conversation.

Post reply Preview Save draft