Carl
Member
OP
Rack & Stack
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 227
- From:
- Chicago, US
Ran the numbers on our last migration. 47 stable workloads, 3 environments, 2 racks at Leaseweb.
Option A: Stay on Proxmox VMs, 2 hours monthly maintenance
Option B: Kubernetes with Helm charts, 40 hours monthly, 3 outages from YAML indentation
Container hosting is VPS with extra YAML for anything that doesn't auto-scale. Change my mind.
Hardware: Dell R640s, 2x Xeon 4214, 128GB. Power draw 180W per node. Pallet shipped March.
visit twice: install and decom
haroldgsm
Member
Grumpy Old Sysadmin
- Joined:
- May 2024
- Posts:
- 329
- From:
- Ohio, US
Container hype Than real benefit for most workload
Server down not because of container, because of too many abstraction layer
I deploy plain KVM for five year now, zero issue. Simple Is Reliable
Your YAML not infrastructure, its configuration with extra steps
IPv4, IRC, and irssi — fight me